ASSESSMENT OF "PRACTICALITY" AND "CORRECTNESS" OF SPECIAL SOFTWARE OF AUTOMATED MILITARY INFORMATION SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2519-481X/2022/74-09Keywords:
special software, automated information systems, assessment of practicality and correctness, adequacy and reliability of the programming quality levelAbstract
The assessment of the "practicality" and "correctness" of special software of the automated military information systems is consider in the article. It’s shown that the information resource of the high-precision weapons must have a full set of software as active and passive protection against attacks on its information systems, and its active and passive influences on all existing and promising weapons systems. Among the problems associated with the creation of special software (SS) of the automated information military systems, there are two main ones: the problem of creating high-quality special software; the problem of rationalizing the efficiency of the participants of the SS life cycle. One of the promising areas of their solution is the implementation of the regulated technological process. The systematic approach is to reduce software errors by detecting and locating them in the timely manner, reducing the complexity of detecting and correcting them through clear and orderly structures and connections.
A characteristic of the SS’s practicality is the studied, that is characterized by efforts required for users to master the conditions, procedures and rules of application of the software. They are described by the following indicators: the average time of development of the software product by service personnel, the completeness coefficient of the demo version, the completeness and flexibility coefficient of the help system.
The characteristics of ease operation and correctness of SS is characterized by ease of preparation of input data and start-up of SS. The quantitative assessment is characterized by the following indicators: the coefficient of the degree of automation of data entry control, the coefficient of use of effective means of data entry. The estimating of the necessary intellectual effort to create a program is characterized by the number of necessary basic solutions when creating program code, but it doesn’t take into account debugging actions, so the authors propose to introduce a factor of real complexity, that is to estimate the cost of program perception. The given metrics allow to receive their numerical values on the basis of that it’s possible to compare programs on these quality characteristics.
References
1. Boehm B.W., Philip N. Papaccio. Understanding and Controling Software Costs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, №14(10), 1988, рр. 1462-1476.
2. Chernikov B.V., Poklonov B.E. (2012), Upravlenie kachestvom programmnogo obespechenija. Praktikum. Moskva.: ND «Forum», 240 p.
3. Grady R.B. An economic release decision model: insights into software project management // In proceedings of the applications of software measurement conference, Orange Park, Fl: Software Quality Engineering, 1999. P. 227-239.
4. Barlas S. Anatomy of a Runaway: What Grounded the AAS // IEEE Software, January 1996. - P. 104-106.
5. Naumov A.I., Vzorov V.N. (2012), Koncepcija upravlenija znanijami i praktika kompanii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Serija 24. Menedzhment. №2, S. 33 – 78.
6. Gibbs W. Software's Chronic Crisis // Scientific America, September 1994. - P. 86-95;
7. F.I. Andon, G.I. Koval', G.M. Korotun, V.Ju. Suslov (2002), Osnovy inzhenerii kachestva programmnyh sistem / NAN Ukrainy, Institut programmnyh sistem. K.: Akademperiodika, 503s.
8. Lipaev V.V. (2001), Vybor i ocenivanie harakteristik kachestva programmyh sredstv. Metody i standarty. M.: SINTEG, 228 s.
9. DSTU 2850-94 Programni zasoby EOM. Pokaznyky i metody ocinjuvannja jakosti;
10. ISO/IEC 9126-1. 2001. Software engineering – Software product quality – Part 1: Quality model. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization;
11. Molodcova O.P. (2001), Upravlinnja jakistju programnoi' produkcii': Navch. posibnyk // Kyi'vs'kyj nacional'nyj ekonomichnyj universytet. – K.: KNEU, 248s.
12. Holsted M.H.(1981), Nachalo nauki o programmah. M.: Finansy i statistika, 128s.
