A COMPLEX MODEL OF SYSTEM RESEARCH OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE FACILITIES SECURITY PROBLEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2519-481X/2022/77-13Keywords:
ensuring security, objects of critical infrastructure, national and military security, decision-making methodsAbstract
The development of methodological approaches to the solution of an understudied problem, namely to the systematic study of aspects of ensuring the safety of important critical infrastructure facilities is shown in the paper. According to the Law "On the Basics of National Security of Ukraine", the objects of critical infrastructure are: transport and communication; energy and energy supply; provision of housing and communal services; industry and scientific and technical activity in the military-industrial complex; dual purpose technologies; information technologies and information protection; use of subsoil; land on water resources; mineral resources; environmental protection, etc. A system of classifications of prognostic modeling methods has been developed in the form of a three-level structure: by forecasting methods and information bases; according to the material basis of the instrument for obtaining the final result; according to the classification scheme of the specified specific methods.
The complex model of system research of critical infrastructure facilities security problems from the position of the Armed Forces of Ukraine has been developed. The mathematical apparatus of analysis and assessment of the level of national (military) security, including military-political, military-economic, military-political models of the state, is presented. The specific features of problem classes by direction, namely well and weakly structured problems, are determined. The use of game theory to compensate for statistical selection is proposed. The main methods of decision-making are given: the methods of utility theory (generalized criterion); the cumulative expected utility as a valid method of decision trees; the methods of prospect theory; the methods of inequality thresholds; the methods of analyzing hierarchies, that are based on a multi-criteria description of the problem; the heuristic methods. It’s shown that the most developed theoretical basis, that finds application in determining the security status of critical infrastructure objects and security in general, are expert methods or methods of multidimensional analysis with elements of taxonomy. However, these approaches assume the existence of reference objects or the scenario of the influence of factors on the final result imagined by experts. An important conclusion was made that the basis of the scientific contradiction is the need to create a sufficiently perfect mechanism for solving the problems of objectively justifying decisions in the military sphere under the conditions of significant limitations in the acquisition of biased data for the prevention of conflicts in the military sphere and the absence of finished scientific theory for determining the result of the complex impact of various factors.
References
1. Zakon Ukraine (2018), «Pro natsIonalnu bezpeku Ukraine» [About the national security of Ukraine]. VIdomostI VerhovnoYi Radi, No.31, pp.241.
2. Kosevtsov, V. O. (2000), NatsIonalna bezpeka UkraYini: teorIya, realnIst, prognoz [National security of Ukraine: theory, reality, forecast] - K.: TsMBSS, Satsanga,. – 80 p.
3. Bogdanovich, V. Yu. (2003), VoEnna bezpeka UkraYini: metodologIya doslIdzhennya ta shlyahi zabezpechennya [Military security of Ukraine: research methodology and ways of ensuring] – K. : "Tirazh", – 322 p.
4. Duz-Kryatchenko, O.P., Gritsay, P.M., Grischenko, V.P., KlImenko, V.S., Kozinets, I.P., Kosevtsov, V.O., NechhaEv, S.M., Punda, Yu.V. (2015), "Osnovi strategiyi natsionalnoyi bezpeki ta oboroni derzhavi: pIdruchnik" [Basics of the strategy of national security and defense of the state] – K.: NUOU Im. Ivana Chernyahovskogo, – 620 p.
5. GorbulIn, V.P. (2017), SvItova gIbridna vIyna: ukraYinskiy front:monografIya [World hybrid war: Ukrainian front: monograph], za zag.red. V.P. GorbulIna. – K.: NISD, – 496 p.
6. Shpak, V.I., TabachnIkov, S.I. (2019), "NatsIonalna bezpeka Ukraine u viklikah novitno v istorivi" [National security of Ukraine in the challenges of recent history] – K.: DP «Ekspres-ob`yava», – 468 p.
7. Lipkan, V.A. (2009), "NatsIonalna bezpeka Ukraine" [National security of Ukraine] - K. : KNT, — 576 p.
8. Bogdanovich, V. Yu., Manachinskiy, A.Ya. (2001), "Metodologicheskie osnovyi sistemnyih issledovaniy problem voennoy bezopasnosti gosudarstva" [Methodological basis of system studies of problems of military security of the state] – K.; – 172 p.
9. Shevchenko, V. L. (2010), "Metodi modelyuvannya protsesIv dIyalnostI mInIsterstva oboroni Ukraine" [Methods of modeling the activity processes of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine] – K. : NUOU, – 90 p.
10. Lenkov, S.V., Dergilova, O.V., Vinyarskiy, Ya.Ya. (2011), "Sistemotehnichni priyomi formalizatsiyi slabko strukturovanih zadach dlya rishennya praktichnih zadach sferi zabezpechennya natsionalnoyi bezpeki derzhavi" [System-technical methods of formalization of weakly structured problems for solving practical problems in the sphere of ensuring the national security of the state]. Visnik Inzhenernoyi akademiyi Ukraine, No. 3-4. – pp. 89 – 93.
11. Saati, T., Vognadze, V. G., (1993), "Prinyatie resheniy: Metod analiza ierarhiy" [Decision-making: Hierarchical analysis method] , M. : Radio i svyaz, 1993. – p.184.
12. Kosevtsov, V.O., Binko, I. F., Matvievskiy, O. M. (1995), "Metodichniy pidhid do analizu y otsinki rivnya natsionalnoyi bezpeki ta yiyi skladovih" [A methodical approach to the analysis and assessment of the level of national security and its components] Nauka i oborona. – No. 1. – pp. 74–77.
13. GorbulIn, V.P., Kachinskiy, O.B. (2007), "Sistemno-kontseptualnI zasadi strategIYi natsIonalnoYi bezpeki UkraYini: monografIya" [Systemic and conceptual principles of the national security strategy of Ukraine: monograph] – K.: DP «NVTs EvroatlantIkIform», – 592 p.
14. Klir, D. (1990), "Sistemologiya: Avtomatizatsiya resheniya sistemnyih zadach" [Systemology: Automation of solving system problems], – M.: Radio i svyaz, – 544 p. 15. SchedrIna, O.I. (2020), "Sistemniy analIz yak Instrument priynyattya upravlInskih rIshen v bIznesI" [System analysis as a tool for making management decisions in business] Visnik KNEU – K: KNEU, No. 99. Pp.170-184, DOI 10/3311| 99.15.
16. Bestuzhev-Lada, I.V. (1982), "Rabochaya kniga po prognozirovaniyu" [Workbook on forecasting] – M.: Myisl, – 430 p.
17. Pornev, A.G., Rumyantseva, Z.P., Solomatin, N.A. (2000), "Upravlenie organizatsiey" [Management of organizations]. Uchebnik – 2-e izd. pererab.i dop. – M.: – 669 p.
18. Pornev, A.G., Rumyantseva, Z.P., Solomatin, N.A. (2000), "Upravlenie organizatsiey" [Management of organizations]. Uchebnik – 2-e izd. pererab.i dop. – M.: – 669 p.
19. Milnera, B. 3. (1971), "SShA: sovremennyie metodyi upravleniya" [USA: modern management methods]. – M. : Nauka, – 334 p.
20. Kolpakov, V.M., Ponomarenko, S.O., Selyukov, O.V. (2021), "Osnovi strategyii": monografIya [Basics of strategy] – K.: Vidavnitstvo Lyudmila, – 474 p.
21. Avinash Dissit, Barri Neyltaff. (2011), "Teoriya igr. Iskusstvo matematicheskoy ekonomiki" [Game theory. The art of mathematical economics]. – M.: Maks-press. – 464 p.
22. Hog, E. (1983), "Prikladnoe optimalnoe proektirovanie" [Applied optimal design], Arora Ya. – M. : Mir, – 478 p.
23. Koh, Richarz. (2012), "Printsip 80/2". [Principle 80/2.]. Monografiya. Perevod s ang. – M. Eksmo, - 444 p.
24. Huntington, S. P. (1999), "The Lonely Superpower" [The Lonely Superpower] March/April, Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 35-49.
25. Vorobyov, V. V. (1984), "Osnovyi teorii igr. Beskoalitsionnyie igryi" [Basics of game theory. Non-coalition games]. – M. : Nauka, – 496 p.
26. Vasin, A.A., Morozov, V.V. (2005), "Teoriya igr i modeli matematicheskoy ekonomiki" [Game theory and models of mathematical economics]. – M.: Maks-press. – 272 p.
27. Steuen, R.T. (1986), "Multyple Criterial optimization: Theory, Computations and Application" [Multiple Criterion Optimization: Theory, Computations and Applications]. – New York, John Wilay & Sons, Ips, 420 p.
28. Sobol, I.M. (2006), "Vyibor optimalnyih parametrov v zadachah so mnogimi kriteriyami" [Selection of optimal parameters in problems with many criteria]. – M.: Drofa, 176 s.
29. Morgenshtern, O., Fon Neyman, Dzh. (2013), "Teoriya igr i ekonomicheskoe povedenie" [Game theory and economic behavior]. – M.: Kniga po trebovaniyu, – 708 p.
30. KInnI, R., Rayf, H. (2010), "Priynyattya rIshen pri bagatoh kriterIyah: perevagi y zamIschennya" [Decision-making with multiple criteria: advantages and substitutions]. H.: Znannya, – 248 p.
